First patient project: Engaging pathology through the donor dissection experience and its role in professionalism.

The peer-reviewed anatomical education literature thoroughly describes the benefits and drawbacks of donor dissection. Gross anatomy laboratory environments utilizing donor dissection are generally considered to be a premier environment where students foster non-traditional discipline-independent skills (NTDIS), including the acquisition of professionalism, empathy, resilience, emotional intelligence, and situational awareness. Therefore, this IRB-approved study explored the impact of a formal humanism and pathology thread, the first patient project (FPP), on the personal and professional development of pre-professional undergraduate students in a gross anatomy dissection-based course. Five reflections from each student were collected across four cohorts (n = 74 students, 370 reflections). A post-course questionnaire collected data on student perceptions of the project. The framework method was used to analyze reflection and free response data and descriptive statistics were performed on Likert-style items using Excel. Three themes were identified to encompass the impacts of the FPP on professional development and include: Socialization (through collective dissection experience and pathology), Humanistic Qualities (respect for the donor and their history, and introspection), and Content and Skills (technical and NTDIS, anatomical knowledge). The end of course FPP survey was completed by 29 students across three cohorts (65%) and their perspectives were generally favorable regarding the promotion of respect, empathy, and humanization of their donors. This study underscores the value of incorporating humanism, pathology, and reflection, facilitated through formal curriculum for pre-professional undergraduate students. It provides evidence of the positive impact on their personal and professional development, supporting the integration of NTDIS in curricula across various disciplines.

I am an Educator: Investigating Professional Identity Formation using Social Cognitive Career Theory.

PhenomenonClinician-educators (CE) are physicians who fill a unique role within academic medicine, as they are responsible both for patient care and for training future physicians via teaching, curricular design, and creation of educational scholarship. Development of a strong professional identity as an educator leads to greater career satisfaction and a higher likelihood of staying in academic medicine. However, little is known about how this identity develops, especially in the training environment where there are competing pressures to develop as a clinician and researcher. This study aimed to explore professional identity formation in residents and fellows interested in becoming educators. Approach: We used a longitudinal, qualitative approach to investigate professional identity formation in residents and fellows participating in the Clinician-Educator Training Pathway. The longitudinal nature allowed us to temporally explore which aspects of the program and experiences acted as barriers or facilitators of professional identity formation as a CE. Our study used the social cognitive career theory (SCCT) Career Choice Model, which considers contextual influences in addition to the three variables of self-efficacy beliefs, outcome expectations, and goals. Findings: We found that participants shared a common goal of building self-efficacy as an educator. Participants took actions to engage more deliberately in formal and informal teaching and acting as an educator by giving learner feedback, developing curricula, and consuming and conducting educational research, all of which increased self-efficacy as educators. At the beginning of the program, participants were unclear of the roles and trajectories followed to become CEs. Engaging with a community of CEs clarified pathways and presented role models that could be seen as possible selves. This study also elucidated contextual influences relating to personal factors, career opportunities, and potential for advancement that mediated the goals and actions taken by participants to become educators. Insights: This study demonstrates that the SCCT Career Choice Model provides an excellent framework for understanding professional identity formation in future educators. Our participants built self-efficacy, formed outcome expectations, and set goals and took specific actions toward the goal of becoming an educator. Participants tested the various role model attributes as possible selves to see how those would be effective in their own career. Reflection on expectations, career goals, and self-efficacy as a clinician and an educator can assist in identity formation as a CE and can assist those designing CE training programs to better support identity formation in their participants.